FXTM vs Swissquote 2026

Two licensed kitchens. Which table you take comes down to how you trade.

Pull up a chair at FXTM if you value tighter spreads, lower minimum deposit ($10 vs $1000), copy trading. Swissquote plates up better for anyone who leans on real stock ownership, more instruments (3,000,000 vs 1,000).

The two menus, side by side

FXTMSwissquote
Primary regulatorCySEC 185/12FCA 562379
Regulation tiertier-1tier-1
Min deposit$10$1000
EUR/USD spread0.1 pips1.3 pips
Instruments1,000+3,000,000+
MetaTraderYes (MT4+MT5)Yes (MT4+MT5)
Copy tradingYesNo
Real stocksNo, CFDs onlyYes
Inactivity fee$5/mo after 6mo$10/mo after 12mo
Founded20111996
HeadquartersLimassol, CyprusGland, Switzerland

The kitchen inspection: FXTM vs Swissquote

FXTM is regulated by CySEC under licence 185/12 (Forextime Ltd). The CySEC is a tier-1 regulator. Client funds are held in segregated accounts and negative balance protection applies.

Swissquote is regulated by FCA under licence 562379 (Swissquote UK Ltd). The FCA is a tier-1 regulator. Client funds are held in segregated accounts and negative balance protection applies.

Both brokers are regulated by tier-1 authorities. Neither has a significant regulatory advantage over the other.

Ingredient costs and the bill

FXTM's EUR/USD spread is 0.1 pips. Swissquote's EUR/USD spread is 1.3 pips. FXTM offers tighter spreads on this pair.

FXTM charges an inactivity fee of $5/month after 6 months without trading. Swissquote charges an inactivity fee of $10/month after 12 months.

Platforms and tools

Both FXTM and Swissquote support MetaTrader 4 and 5, so algorithmic traders and EA users can use either.

FXTM offers copy trading, Swissquote does not.

The cover charge

FXTM requires a minimum deposit of $10. Swissquote requires $1000. FXTM has the lower barrier to entry. Traders who want to start with less capital should consider FXTM.

Note that minimum deposits can vary by account type and by which regulatory entity serves your country. Some offshore entities allow lower deposits than the tier-1 entity.

Which is better for beginners?

FXTM is generally better for beginners because it offers copy trading, allowing new traders to replicate experienced traders automatically while learning. FXTM also has the lower minimum deposit of $10, making it easier to start with a small amount. Both platforms are accessible to new traders, though neither is specifically designed as a beginner-only broker.

Which is better for experienced traders?

Both FXTM and Swissquote support MetaTrader, so experienced traders can use either without restriction. FXTM's tighter spreads (0.1 pips) make it better for high-frequency and scalping strategies. Swissquote offers more instruments (3,000,000) for portfolio diversification.

The verdict: FXTM vs Swissquote

Book a table at FXTM if what you are after is tighter spreads, lower minimum deposit ($10 vs $1000), copy trading. Its CySEC licence (185/12) brings the full weight of a tier-1 seal.

Go with Swissquote if you want real stock ownership, more instruments (3,000,000 vs 1,000). Its FCA licence (562379) means solid tier-1 protection.

Neither kitchen is a bad one; both hold real licences. In the end it is your own trading appetite that picks the table.

Frequently asked questions

FXTM vs Swissquote: which is better?

FXTM is better for tighter spreads, lower minimum deposit ($10 vs $1000), copy trading. Swissquote is better for real stock ownership, more instruments (3,000,000 vs 1,000). If regulation quality is your priority, both have comparable regulation.

Is FXTM or Swissquote safer?

Both FXTM (CySEC 185/12) and Swissquote (FCA 562379) are regulated by tier-1 authorities. Both segregate client funds.

What is the minimum deposit for FXTM and Swissquote?

FXTM minimum deposit: $10. Swissquote minimum deposit: $1000. Minimums vary by entity and account type.

Do FXTM and Swissquote have MetaTrader?

Yes, both support MetaTrader 4 and MT5.

73% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with FXTM. 68% lose money with Swissquote. CFD trading involves significant risk. This is not investment advice.